Thursday, April 17, 2014

Why I am Declaring Bankruptcy

Calling yourself a writer feels a lot like Michael Scott declaring bankruptcy: as Toby informs Michael, that is not exactly how it works. You can't just say something and call it into existence.

But maybe, you can declare something, and then take action. Maybe the declaration is necessary as a writer. I don't know about declaring bankruptcy; I think the rules for that are a little more cut and dry. But as for writing, let the record show I am pro-declaration.




Here's what I think (and where I disagree with Toby): If you write, you are a writer. If your writing is published, you are a published writer. Anyone who writes without a gun pointed at their head can call themselves a writer. But if you want to be called a good writer, well, there is no label so solidifying as that.

There are many writers who have been published, who are bad writers. Just because you are published, does not mean you are a good writer. So, that stinks. 

The thing is, if you are looking for validation, you will likely find it. Plenty of people will tell you that you are good at writing, if you ask around enough. Plenty of people will tell you that you are terrible at writing, too. Plenty of publishers will turn you down. As they have turned down many-a-good writer.

I want someone to tell me I have what it takes. But for every person who tells me that, there will be at least one other person out there who thinks I don't have what it takes. This is why you should never put your self worth in the hands of others. There is little comfort in their opinions.

Being a writer is about writing. It is not about being patted on the back. It is about being the best writer you can possibly be, because that is the best you will ever be, and no more. The only feedback you can ever trust is what is given to you by people you trust and respect. And in that case, you are only a good writer to them. There is also Time, which is perhaps the fairest judge of good writing. But it's still all a little shaky, isn't it?

There will always be doubts in the minds of writers as long as there are sentences left to form. But you won't ever be a writer unless you call yourself one first. I hesitate to call myself a writer because in doing so, I feel like an imposter. Because I am not published. Because I only have this blog. And also because calling myself a writer is totally terrifying. It means I have something to live up to. It means I am opening myself up for judgment. But this is the year for dispelling fears, so I am going to take the leap.

I'm a writer, because I write. I am a writer, because I am working on getting published. I am slowly but surely working on a novel that I will attempt to have published before I die. That may not be good enough for you, but it is good enough for me. And so, I am a writer.

The rock solid truth behind the sentiments of this post is: if you don't declare it, you can't fail. By saying I am a writer,I am throwing "failure" into the mix of possible outcomes of my writing journey. But failure is just as subjective as "good writing" is in this instance. And who is afraid of failure? Not me.

How silly this all sounds, now that it is in the open. How silly to be afraid. How silly to declare bankruptcy.


So I ask you this, all of you aspiring writers (or aspring anythings): will you call yourself a writer with me? Let us declare that we are writers as boldly and confidently as Michael Scott declares bankruptcy. And then let's write--and keep writing until we have become better than anyone else who shares our same thumb print.



P.S. Why writing is terrifying...

8 comments:

  1. Okay (*takes deep breath in*) - I'm a writer too!
    As always, LOVE this post Jenny!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Agh! I'm scared. I don't really consider myself a "writer". But maybe I wanna be?? So I will be. Here goes - I am a writer. I may not write every day and I may not write well and I may be a terrible speller. But I write. And I enjoy it.
    Way to be brave and call others in as well! Your energy is contagious!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Gosh, I have so many thoughts. Ahem.
    "The only feedback you can ever trust is what is given to you by people you trust and respect." This is true. But I can't tell you HOW many authors I have edited who have disregarded my edits and told me they're not changing anything because "so and so read it and said it was amazing." This person was usually their mother or wife/husband or a close friend. These are people you (usually) respect and also people you *think* you would be able to trust. But these are, in the majority of cases, *not* the types of people who are able to give you an honest opinion and therefore are not to be trusted in this situation.
    This, then, leads to the question: why did these authors not trust me? Because they did not respect my editorial, professional opinion. Which is exactly why there are a lot of published books out there that are terrible and why self-publishing has such a bad name, because any yahoo who can type can go out and publish a book, and they get validation from their family and think they're the next Stephen King. I'm not sure what my point is right now. I guess I'm agreeing with you that there are many excellent writers who are not published, and there are so many terrible writers who are published. It sucks.
    So the trust and respect thing is true, but you need to be careful about whom you trust and respect in this type of writing situation. Because while there is little comfort in the opinions of others, it's saying something when other people who are completely unbiased toward you validate your ability to write. And there is *some* comfort in it, at least for me.
    P.S. I'm a writer too :) But I more identify with "editor." Also, not that you would have to let me edit your book, but I would like to think you would trust me to edit it ;)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Okay, I don't know if I am contradicting myself by saying this or not, but I totally agree with you! When I said you can only trust the people you trust and respect, I think I was thinking of other writers and editors you respect. Because I think a total stranger's critique of your writing can be confusing if you don't know anything about them. A good editor, on the other hand, has a background to back them up, and so they SHOULD be trusted. The kind of person you describe scares me, because I don't want to be that person. Maybe I should have said, "people *whose opinion on that matter* you trust and respect". I guess I worry about living in a delusion because I tend to accept all praise when it comes to my writing. I would like to be able to take criticism and praise both, with a grain of salt.
    P.S. I would completely trust you to edit my book. What would you charge for a reading of the first few chapters? :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yay!! We did it and we survived. I hope you feel better, because I do.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yes yes yes. I have such trouble calling myself a writer. My family sings it out to anyone who will hear: "Delia's a writer!" And then I mutter something along the lines of, "well, sort of..." But lately I have been more brave about it. What you've said rings so true to me. So, here it is: I am a writer, too!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I AM A WRITER!
    I don't know why, but I have no problem telling people I'm a writer. I write. I have a degree in creative writing. I write: I AM A WRITER! Maybe this means I need to better appreciate what that means, and then I won't be so confident. Until then... I'm a writer!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thank you, Miriam! And I always love your comments. We are writers!

    ReplyDelete

Leaving a comment? Oh, you are too kind!